Archive for the ‘apparent possession’ Category

Distress: were goods in the apparent possession of the sub-tenant or the intermediate landlord?

September 20, 2012

InĀ Fort Crown Investments Ltd v Tam Virginia V ([2006] HKEC 63, CA) there was a lease and a sub-lease of property. The head landlord levied distress on goods owned by the sub-tenant. The Court of Appeal decided that since the goods were actually owned by the sub-tenant, and the head landlord had notice of the sub-tenant’s claim to them, they were not in the apparent possession of the intermediate landlord.