Stack v Dowden in Hong Kong

In Ha Yuet Chi v Yeung Yiu Keung ([2010] HKEC 1726), a mother and son were joint tenants of a flat in Chevalier Garden in Shatin. The mother claimed that she had provided the purchase price and had not intended to make a gift to her son. She claimed to be the sole beneficial owner. The District Court thought that the son had probably made some contribution to mortgage payments. It invoked Stack v Dowden. A precise arithmetic approach to contributions was not necessary in family cases; rather one should look for the parties’ intentions having regard to family history and other relevant factors (para. 35). The court rejected the contention that the mother was intended to be solely beneficially entitled.

Advertisements

One Response to “Stack v Dowden in Hong Kong”

  1. Fergus Chau Says:

    It seems to me that in family cases, unless the agreement or common intention agreed to have the extent of beneficial ownership to be divided by exact quantifiable shares, otherwise, after concluding on the existence of a trust, it is likely that the Court would not go further into calculating how much each party owns (arithmetic approach) but rather to use a severance approach (50/50)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: