Was a greenhouse part of the land?

In Goldful Way Development Ltd v Wellstable Development Ltd ([1999] 1 HKLRD 563) G had agreed to buy a house from W. There was a greenhouse in the backyard. This was an unauthorised structure that would have to be demolished. The question was whether W could demolish the greenhouse and still comply with the obligation to give good title. W’s argument that the greenhouse was not part of the land agreed to be sold failed. The greenhouse was firmly attached to the rest of the house, it could only be moved by demolition, it had been made to measure for the house. Applying Elitestone, the greenhouse was both a fixture and part and parcel of the land. W nevertheless succeeded because it was held that even if it demolished the greenhouse it could still substantially perform its agreement with G.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: