Adverse possession: enclosure is strong evidence of possession and intention to possess

In Ho Hang-Wan v Ma Ting-Cheung ([1990] 1 HKLR 649, CA) the plaintiff had been in occupation of land since 1964. The plaintiff and her husband had erected a fence around the land when they first occupied it. In 1987 the plaintiff applied for a declaration that she had good possessory title to the land. The question was whether she had the necessary intention to possess. Hunter JA thought that fencing off the land was clear evidence of this intention:

‘[I]t seems to me that such intent is necessarily established by unequivocal evidence of exclusive physical possession.’ (at 654)

Ho Hang-wan is also an important authority for the proposition that the death of a licensor terminates a licence and that there is no need for the licensee to have notice of death / termination of the licence. It is this aspect of the case that has featured more prominently in later decisions.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: