«
»

Rent is not an essential element of a lease: Ashburn-Anstalt v Arnold

Lord Templeman appeared to suggest in Ashburn-Anstalt v Arnold ([1989] Ch 1) that an agreement to pay rent was an essential element of a lease. In Ashburn-Anstalt, the English Court of Appeal explained that this is not the case (and that Lord Templeman had not intended to say that a rent is an essential element of a lease).

Advertisement

This entry was posted on September 18, 2010 at 4:58 am and is filed under lease definition, leases, rent, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: